tremor wrote: ↑
March 12th, 2019, 8:23 am
ralpeg wrote: ↑
March 12th, 2019, 1:21 am
tremor wrote: ↑
March 11th, 2019, 7:05 pm
Already said ITT. They don't create value.
so there are useless guys that become models and make money from that without providing money.
do you think they are at fault for taking money people give them, while being useless?
if you were as useless as them and got money for something looks related like that blue eyed south asian, then would you give it back?
some people are useless and some useless people get lucky and get money despite being useless and not adding real value. So unless you think you would give the money back were you as useless as them but with their luck, then why would you blame them?
Blame for what?
Also, I can't possibly know whether I would give money or not because I have never felt people were on my side, while Chad always feels this way from the validation he gets. Perhaps I would donate something to charities to virtue signal.
II'm not asking if you'd give money.
In response to "Why hate them?" You said They don't create value.
and you said "incels may hate people whose success is only thanks to their looks and IMO it's justified in a sense, because such people usually don't create value."
You agree they are not to blame.
So they're useless and don't create value. A lot of incels are useless and don't create value. They got lucky. They're not to blame.
Why hate people that are not to blame?
You don't hate people when they don't create value, but you hate people when they don't create value and then get lucky, whle you agree they are not to blame for getting lucky while not creating value.
I don't understand your positon at all.
Can't you see that your argument doesn't follow?! I don't see how you can even think that your argument follows. IF you want to admit that you're irrational and providing an irrational argument then fine. But you haven't stated that. Another person in the thread has stated that of himself, but you haven't.