Why do ugly people even exist? (Evolution)

lordoftheincels

Well-Known Member
Staff Member
Lounge member
StoicNihilist said:
lordoftheincels said:
I been wondering it too. Its like asians look and act like cats. I think this Earth is actually a testing ground for aliens to do mutations on us. I'm not actually trolling I'm serious.

All cats look the same but some dogs are ugly.
Cats believe it or not are not entirely domesticated. They just sort of wandered into early human civilization and they were inherently tame enough to keep around as pets.

Dogs on the other hand are domesticated by us, and we done fucked their ѕhit right up. Look at the beautiful and majestic wolf, the original canine created by nature. An awe striking, pack oriented, killing machine that can endure the most extreme conditions nature can throw at it with stoic grace.

Now look at the pug. A tiny, hideous, flat faced, little monster that can hardly even breath on it's own and cannot breed properly without human intervention. It is entirely dependent on us, it can hardly survive a day out in nature. My aunts pug died cause it escaped one day in november and it died from hypothermia in a just a few hours. We did that to it. From the wolf, to the pug. It was we humans that created it.

Maybe you're right, maybe we are experiments whose genetic code was placed here by beings far greater than us for their amusement.

fixed your post (vcelguy)
Most dogs are not pugs, so nice over-dramatization.
 

inunotaisho

Member
Nature did not necessarily intend for us to be ugly, its just a lottery wheel for your eyes, nose etc all gathered from your extensive DNA map. I got the asian face, height, my Swedish father's blue eyes. I got crooked fingers which apparently is a mutation from my grandfather but my dad does not have those. I have essential tremors (my hands and head are shaking ranging from a small tremor to borderline fit attack) a neuro disorder from birth (thank's ma!) while my half sister and half brother doesnt (we have the same mother but its 50% that E.T carries on from the mother to the child).
My half brother does not look anything like me tho. His father was a burly 6'3 military hunk with brown curly hair etc. He looks like Steven Seagal before he got too fat. Mum left her first man because she's a gold digger and my dad has money (zero for me, told him to go fuck, himself several years ago).
 

smolcunt

New Member
I think it has to do with past societal structures. We'd created bigoted biased rules when it came to pairing and breeding as a result of attempting to maintain a "stable society" and with that came unreasonable norms and values. Im speaking of arranged marriages, inbreeding, opression etc. Looking at, per se, the Habsburgs, they were one ugly bunch and that's because their family tree was basically a line and boy did they spread these inbred genes all over Europe. Why? Because if you want to maintain good relations with a neighboring nation, you go marry your nine year old daughter with their thirty year old prince. And lots of royal families liked inbreeding. It was all the rage and of course, it wasn't only royal families, they just got to spread the genes all far and wide. You can still see the remnants of inbreeding within southern stereotypes, etc. When you're all isolated in the middle of nowhere, might as well do your sister.
Then there's also money, of course, which can make a woman swallow her pride, as well as, again, reputations. Jee, sure wouldn't want your farmer ass to suffer the horrible fate of your son marrying the beautiful *poor* girl downhill, would you? Absolutely not, that rascall oughta be marrying good old ugly Hilda to the south because of her families massive ammount of livestock.
Sure, we are, instinct-wise, inclined towards prettier people but that remains only an unachievable ideal when the pressing pistons of taboos, norms and the way you were raised are upon you. And the suppression of a yearning so deeply rooted can only give birth to frustration and suffering. But that's a story for another time.
So there's my two cents on why we're here and why fetishism is a thing.
 

lordoftheincels

Well-Known Member
Staff Member
Lounge member
Don't know what any of that has to do with fetishism.

Everything you said is true but it doesn't explain why uglies exist. The fact simply is that lower evolved humans, cro-magnons, are ugly, over many hundreds of years of evolution they change into a more angelic form.

The trouble is that evolution seems to care mostly about looks, there are many pretty people who are ugly on the inside, ugly people who are pretty on the inside, society does not care about those, just bases everything on looks. Then defines internal ugliness as any form of masculinity, praising cucks and beta males for their subservience. Anyone who posts views contrary to the norm is deemed ugly, anyone who resorts to physical confrontations such as throwing bricks on glass windows, is deemed "ugly", etcetera.
 

blkpillpres

Member
StoicNihilist said:
Shouldn't ugliness have been bred out of humanity a long time ago? Why aren't we a bunch of Chad's and Stacy's living an awesome life instead of genetic freaks who fail at everything
First off gly people don't fail at everything, they just fail at being attractive, just that one thing, ugly people usually contribute to society way more that good looking people, especially with respect to technological advancements. I would not even doubt that the wheel was invited by some ugly fuck.

Now to address the reasons as to why unattractive/ugly people still exist despite millions of years of breeding

1. Rape was not always illegal, nor did birth control exist, a woman raped by an unattractive man and was impregnated, would carry the pregnancy to term

2. Women are more selective than men, so even though women weren't selecting men beneath their looks league, men were often fuсking below their looks league and impregnating as much women as they can, ugliness doesn't begin and end with men, so long as ugly women are allowed to breed, there will always be ugly men being born.
 

GODabovethedome

New Member
BANNED
one evolution is a lie
GOD is above the dome
and yes it's on video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAcp3BFBYw4

when the time comes if you make the choice to believe and follow Christ
he will fix all your genetic issues
and you will look a lot better
but If you wanna keep believing you came from a rock
go ahead trust me its not a good way to look at things
 

randomuser123

Member
BANNED
Life is polar and everything has the opposite end. There's no light without the dark, there's no beauty without ugliness. This makes some of us luckier, depending what genetic heritage, physical abilities we inherited. Someone may look good on the physical sense but their intelligence is far below, the ones like Dolph Lundgren are really a minority who happen to be both outstandingly intelligent and attractive.
 

curiousfem

New Member
BANNED
Generally throughout history people have been more focused on surviving than on getting an attractive mate (though attractiveness is supposed to be a sign of a healthy partner). So maybe rich people or good hunters or farmers could rely on their resources rather than their looks.
Interesting question though :)
 

lordoftheincels

Well-Known Member
Staff Member
Lounge member
randomuser123 said:
Life is polar and everything has the opposite end. There's no light without the dark, there's no beauty without ugliness. This makes some of us luckier, depending what genetic heritage, physical abilities we inherited. Someone may look good on the physical sense but their intelligence is far below, the ones like Dolph Lundgren are really a minority who happen to be both outstandingly intelligent and attractive.
Bullshit. There can be pleasure without pain, beauty without ugliness. Too much pain makes us numb and interferes with beauty anyway.

Beauty is symmetry, balance. Women are beautiful because they are a bunch of spheres. Boobs, butt, headshape, all like a sphere. Males tend to be more deformed, irregular, boxy looking. Women are attracted to males as a fetish, a contrast to their own perfection.

So in a certain sense, there can be no beauty without struggle. Ugliness however is not needed.

However when everyone is beautiful you kind of get anime syndrome. It gets boring after a while. If there was a VR that looked the same as the woods it would not feel as good as the real woods. Because in the real woods there is the possibility of pain. So I think there still needs to be a possibility of pain, maybe some minor pain like a cut or something. But there doesn't need to be an equal ratio of pain and beauty for it to work. Life can be 1% pain and 99% beauty. I think that is better than a life of 50% pain and 50% beauty.
 

blackheart

Member
there are ugly people because for beautiful people to know that they are beautiful it takes ugly people, more ugliness depends on the vision of each
 

lordoftheincels

Well-Known Member
Staff Member
Lounge member
blackheart said:
there are ugly people because for beautiful people to know that they are beautiful it takes ugly people, more ugliness depends on the vision of each
No it doesn't and thats bad logic but whatever.
 

blackheart

Member
in any case it is because of the natural selection, it is the evolution that wants that, in the animals they all have the same head certain animals are beautiful but that is not why they dominate the world , being ugly we made more effort to integrate then the selection is harder, if we were all beautiful why we would make efforts to become intelligent or muscular? the beautiful are the ones who make efforts even if they found the love, a ugly if he finds the love will make less effort, so for that it is that beautiful it is necessary that each face a maximum of effort and then there will always be inequalities, because of the lack of land resource, water, meat, but it is true that a world where we are all beautiful it would be good, in this case the girls would have but, in my opinion, there would be a new selection criterion, the girls would have the esteem and would not sleep with all the men they meet it's just that we INCEL we are the Scapegoating, he We should organize ourselves around the world, but how we should talk so as not to be bored, on the deep web I did not really find a site to talk between incel
 

lordoftheincels

Well-Known Member
Staff Member
Lounge member
If everyone was beautiful there'd be no incels. The primary concern would be overpopulation. Right now the primary concern is still overpopulation, but mostly its overpopulation of chad thugs chavs, blue pilled normans and idiots

Idiot, French word origin meaning: He who doth not care about the well being of the world. If a rich chad has good genes but does not give a ѕhit about anyone else he is an idiot


Even if blue pilled was true (which it isn't) and women cared more about personality than looks (which they do not)...in a world where we were all beautiful, incels would have never developed unsavory personalities from being treated like ugly pieces of ѕhit in the first place
 

blackheart

Member
lordoftheincels said:
If everyone was beautiful there'd be no incels. The primary concern would be overpopulation. Right now the primary concern is still overpopulation, but mostly its overpopulation of chad thugs chavs, blue pilled normans and idiots

Idiot, French word origin meaning: He who doth not care about the well being of the world. If a rich chad has good genes but does not give a ѕhit about anyone else he is an idiot


Even if blue pilled was true (which it isn't) and women cared more about personality than looks (which they do not)...in a world where we were all beautiful, incels would have never developed unsavory personalities from being treated like ugly pieces of ѕhit in the first place
there would always be one million fewer girls or one million fewer boys, there would be no incar linked to beauty but behavior, let's admit there are 1000 guys and 800 girls, there would be 200 guys who would not have a girlfriend, so there would be 200 incel, and then admit there is 1000 out of 1000 guys and girl they would do orgies? but if we were all nice the fact that terrestrial resources are not unlimited push some people to push to boycott some person, no he should not talk to him because he has blond hair, he should not talk to him because he has black hair, what is beauty for you? for me the beauty there is no color and if we were all beautiful we would not all be the same otherwise it would be disturbing, to have all the head of george clooney or justin timberlake, we would be clones? so if you are beautiful there will still be differences and these differences will depend on tastes from one girl to another, the media and the fashion of the moment.
As I said, it's about victimization, it's respectful because people, certain girls push us to boycott, the media is the cause, if there is someone to whom to take it is the media, but to be valued they need to victimize us
 

lordoftheincels

Well-Known Member
Staff Member
Lounge member
Blue pilled delusions, except for the media part, yes the media wants to make it illegal to be male
 

blackheart

Member
lordoftheincels said:
Blue pilled delusions, except for the media part, yes the media wants to make it illegal to be male
if I was confronted with the hard reality, I am single since always, or 3 girls but it was before my 15 years, on the internet I try for years, in real life I do not speak to any girl, I hate, I would like to associate myself with other incal, but it touches people who are already part of a group and who can not make friends and incel are a minority, i'm 24 years
 
Top