Whiteknight cuck satire thread

tremor

Well-Known Member
Staff Member
Lounge member
lordoftheincels said:
I think women wear makeup because their sex-drives are higher than men. You don't see men going around in booty shorts and belly shirts.
JFL @ assuming male and female sexuality are the same. You could as well say that a freak prettyboy on HRT is a female and vice versa.
The traditional bluepilled coping implies that women have less sexual drive, now they say it's equal to that of men but only for Chad, not you ugly incel.

What seems legit to me, more women than men are too much of an NPC to think about anything beyond natural needs like food, sleep and sex. Also, unlike men, they aren't hardwired into being beta/omega and therefore abstinent from sex. Friendly reminder that Chad takes all women, beta gets leftovers and you get to pay for it all.
 

lordoftheincels

Well-Known Member
Staff Member
Lounge member
tremor said:
What seems legit to me, more women than men are too much of an NPC to think about anything beyond natural needa like food, sleep and sex.
Hey! Stop calling me an NPC! Thats all I think about lol (lol jk I actually have a deeper mind than most, its just my needs arent met so I obsessed about sex and glutton on food to cope.)

Also, unlike men, they aren't hardwired into being beta/omega and therefore abstinent from sex.
Not sure what you mean, sounds like one of those Escher quotes.
 

tremor

Well-Known Member
Staff Member
Lounge member
lordoftheincels said:
Hey! Stop calling me an NPC! Thats all I think about lol (lol jk I actually have a deeper mind than most, its just my needs arent met so I obsessed about sex and glutton on food to cope.)
That "I'm slightly above the average" humble brag cope is hilarious, I'm loving it.

Fun fact: we here only dig that deep intellectually because our lives are trash enough to not have anything more enjoyable to do. You can still cope however you please as long as it's legal, of course.

Not sure what you mean, sounds like one of those Escher quotes.
Yet another reminder that if a man is sub-Chad, he gets next to nothing, while a sub-Stacy female still gets everything she wants, just with less attention from Chad.
 

lordoftheincels

Well-Known Member
Staff Member
Lounge member
tremor said:
lordoftheincels said:
Hey! Stop calling me an NPC! Thats all I think about lol (lol jk I actually have a deeper mind than most, its just my needs arent met so I obsessed about sex and glutton on food to cope.)
That "I'm slightly above the average" humble brag cope is hilarious, I'm loving it.

Fun fact: we here only dig that deep intellectually because our lives are trash enough to not have anything more enjoyable to do. You can still cope however you please as long as it's legal, of course.
Not true. As a kid I was into science and intellectual things. Never was a normie, never truly fit in. So basically once I turned 18 and I lost my looks dating for me became like climbing Mount Everest.

If anything, being incel lowered my IQ because I lost interest in contributing to society.
 

tremor

Well-Known Member
Staff Member
Lounge member
lordoftheincels said:
Not true. As a kid I was into science and intellectual things. Never was a normie, never truly fit in. So basically once I turned 18 and I lost my looks dating for me became like climbing Mount Everest.
So, you never tried before 18 or what?
If anything, being incel lowered my IQ because I lost interest in contributing to society.
Implying bluepilled wageslave whiteknight cucks have giga-IQ.
 

lordoftheincels

Well-Known Member
Staff Member
Lounge member
tremor said:
lordoftheincels said:
Not true. As a kid I was into science and intellectual things. Never was a normie, never truly fit in. So basically once I turned 18 and I lost my looks dating for me became like climbing Mount Everest.
So, you never tried before 18 or what?
If anything, being incel lowered my IQ because I lost interest in contributing to society.
Implying bluepilled wageslave whiteknight cucks have giga-IQ.
No, i have said it other threads. Cucked by religion and feminism making me ultrashy/gigashy. Some women flirted with me before, but I had these deep thoughts that I was unworthy and that it was wrong for me to lust. Also had ptsd thoughts too I was struggling with also at the time. After 18 I realized I lost my good looks and women started being more bitchy and cunty to me than before, soon no woman would flirt with me at all and I was always the one having to approach.
 

lordoftheincels

Well-Known Member
Staff Member
Lounge member
tremor said:
lordoftheincels said:
Not true. As a kid I was into science and intellectual things. Never was a normie, never truly fit in. So basically once I turned 18 and I lost my looks dating for me became like climbing Mount Everest.
So, you never tried before 18 or what?
If anything, being incel lowered my IQ because I lost interest in contributing to society.
Implying bluepilled wageslave whiteknight cucks have giga-IQ.
Some of these IT betamale bearded-man types do probably have giga-IQ. But will probably use it to create gigabots that enslave humanity and punish anyone who is not gigafeminist.
 

tremor

Well-Known Member
Staff Member
Lounge member
lordoftheincels said:
No, i have said it other threads. Cucked by religion and feminism making me ultrashy/gigashy. Some women flirted with me before, but I had these deep thoughts that I was unworthy and that it was wrong for me to lust. Also had ptsd thoughts too I was struggling with also at the time. After 18 I realized I lost my good looks and women started being more bitchy and cunty to me than before, soon no woman would flirt with me at all and I was always the one having to approach.
Sorry for not learning your threads by heart. I can't even remember my threads to be serious ngl.

It's over for niceguycels. No escape from the boot-in-the-face pill.
 

tremor

Well-Known Member
Staff Member
Lounge member
I wonder how long it will be before the "wife's boyfriend" thing becomes more of a norm than of a meme.
inb4 cope it already is
 

Attachments

tremor

Well-Known Member
Staff Member
Lounge member
lordoftheincels said:
the abrahamic god is not real
the pagan gods are real

in b4 cope
Cope. Also
"If God did not exist, it would be necessary to invent him"

 

lordoftheincels

Well-Known Member
Staff Member
Lounge member
Atheists have meaningless, hollow lives. But why the abrahamic god instead of better pagan gods. A world without morals is a world where incel is the norm. What is needed is to bring back the concept of love and morals, instead of shallow meaningless FFA style social gameplay.
 

tremor

Well-Known Member
Staff Member
Lounge member
lordoftheincels said:
Atheists have meaningless, hollow lives.
Sub-Chad men without decent copes have meaningless lives. At best they wageslave to pay taxes and provide for Chad's bastards.
But why the abrahamic god instead of better pagan gods. A world without morals is a world where incel is the norm. What is needed is to bring back the concept of love and morals, instead of shallow meaningless FFA style social gameplay.
Implying paganity era is the time when love and morals were a thing. Kek.

To be unbiased, morals vary from society to society and from time period to time period. In today's Western society it's moral to imprison sub-Chad for not oppressing his biological urges, kill babies to prolong the cock carousel for females, mock virgin socially awkward men online, fire sub-Chad to employ a female instead etc. Once in the West it was moral to shame thots for whoring around, assure proper upbringing of kids in a two-parent family, avoid talking about sexual life in public and hire solely on the basis of merit.

Love is a bluepilled meme at any given moment. Most people were forced to having only one partner and had to cope. They still have to, even though Chad and females can have many partners. It has always been like that, but before the dismissal of enforced monogamy this inequality would be alleviated. Btw, it's amusing how left is right and right is left on this issue.

I believe it's fear behind monogamy of the past and today's 'settling down' in females, not love. It's a foreign concept to females, too complicated of a social construct to comprehend and value. Reminder that a few decades ago women fiercely supported le family values, commitment etc and used to go nuts if they couldn't find a man before like 25 and keep him with her in a family.

They never did it because of love, they did it because they were brainwashed into thinking that unless they do that, they will spend the rest of their lives in loneliness, poverty, misery and social condemnation, that they will be the mockery of the town and a disgrace to the family, that they will never fulfil their biological purpose as mothers and that they will always remain inferior to their friends, happy wives with loving husbands.
bluepilled euphemism for men who, for some mysterious reason, picked comfort and adoration over being incel.

Most of the things above must sound familiar, I'm sure. In fact, females valued family and "believed" in love for fear of ending up as incels. Now this brainwash isn't a thing, they are "free" and we can see that no female ever can be incel. Like, absolutely. Effectively not even a single one in entire world. Also, from this long social experiment we know that females cannot handle actually being incel, they'd gladly pick a family with sub-Chad beta nice guy over guaranteed lifelong loneliness. Still would be unlikely to have sex with him often though, that's just too much for them, but to explain that the "lower sex-drive" meme was introduced.

So, it has never been good, but at least there used to be a more equal distribution of misery. Love and morals are cope.
 

lordoftheincels

Well-Known Member
Staff Member
Lounge member
tremor said:
lordoftheincels said:
Atheists have meaningless, hollow lives.
Sub-Chad men without decent copes have meaningless lives. At best they wageslave to pay taxes and provide for Chad's bastards.
But why the abrahamic god instead of better pagan gods. A world without morals is a world where incel is the norm. What is needed is to bring back the concept of love and morals, instead of shallow meaningless FFA style social gameplay.
Implying paganity era is the time when love and morals were a thing. Kek.

To be unbiased, morals vary from society to society and from time period to time period. In today's Western society it's moral to imprison sub-Chad for not oppressing his biological urges, kill babies to prolong the cock carousel for females, mock virgin socially awkward men online, fire sub-Chad to employ a female instead etc. Once in the West it was moral to shame thots for whoring around, assure proper upbringing of kids in a two-parent family, avoid talking about sexual life in public and hire solely on the basis of merit.

Love is a bluepilled meme at any given moment. Most people were forced to having only one partner and had to cope. They still have to, even though Chad and females can have many partners. It has always been like that, but before the dismissal of enforced monogamy this inequality would be alleviated. Btw, it's amusing how left is right and right is left on this issue.

I believe it's fear behind monogamy of the past and today's 'settling down' in females, not love. It's a foreign concept to females, too complicated of a social construct to comprehend and value. Reminder that a few decades ago women fiercely supported le family values, commitment etc and used to go nuts if they couldn't find a man before like 25 and keep him with her in a family.

They never did it because of love, they did it because they were brainwashed into thinking that unless they do that, they will spend the rest of their lives in loneliness, poverty, misery and social condemnation, that they will be the mockery of the town and a disgrace to the family, that they will never fulfil their biological purpose as mothers and that they will always remain inferior to their friends, happy wives with loving husbands.
bluepilled euphemism for men who, for some mysterious reason, picked comfort and adoration over being incel.

Most of the things above must sound familiar, I'm sure. In fact, females valued family and "believed" in love for fear of ending up as incels. Now this brainwash isn't a thing, they are "free" and we can see that no female ever can be incel. Like, absolutely. Effectively not even a single one in entire world. Also, from this long social experiment we know that females cannot handle actually being incel, they'd gladly pick a family with sub-Chad beta nice guy over guaranteed lifelong loneliness. Still would be unlikely to have sex with him often though, that's just too much for them, but to explain that the "lower sex-drive" meme was introduced.

So, it has never been good, but at least there used to be a more equal distribution of misery. Love and morals are cope.
Seems legit. Don't know how good paganism was in the past but I'm talking about new-age empath wiccans and such. Might be a good defense against this shallow culture where all women care about is the Foul Four: money, status, dominance, and looks.

Also I was watching some old TV show the other day. Hot chick and hot chad was on it. Chad was very predatory towards the woman, tall and leaning over her. Camera was in such a way that it was POV of the woman. The guy was cute and if I was the woman, I might have even let him fuck me. Basically its all about looks. But even in that show Chad could not get laid, the woman mildly resisted (mild resistance to chad means she wants his cock but wants him to dominate her first, mild resistance to sub-chad means get out or cops will be called) but eventually ran away, don't want to go into details but basically he did something really dumb which drove her away. (Note, sub-chads dont need to do anything dumb, just their existence will drive women away.)

Basically want women want is a dick in their pusѕy and someone to cuddle by. Someone who's also easy on the eyes. They are motivated by fear and intimidated by men, marriages are usually inherently toxic. It isn't so much that women love men, but just submits to them. Men are just fetishes for women to use, they don't love men only fear men.
 

tremor

Well-Known Member
Staff Member
Lounge member
lordoftheincels said:
Basically what women want is a dick in their pusѕy and someone to cuddle by. Someone who's also easy on the eyes. They are motivated by fear and intimidated by men, marriages are usually inherently toxic. It isn't so much that women love men, but just submits to them. Men are just fetishes for women to use, they don't love men only fear men.
Idk what about shows, but IRL have seen Stacies not only chasing Chad when he did alpha ѕhit, but also comforting him when he felt "depressed" and didn't do anything. To me it's evidence that it's about looks no matter what you do. Anecdotal, of course, but real.
 

lordoftheincels

Well-Known Member
Staff Member
Lounge member
tremor said:
lordoftheincels said:
Basically what women want is a dick in their pusѕy and someone to cuddle by. Someone who's also easy on the eyes. They are motivated by fear and intimidated by men, marriages are usually inherently toxic. It isn't so much that women love men, but just submits to them. Men are just fetishes for women to use, they don't love men only fear men.
Idk what about shows, but IRL have seen Stacies not only chasing Chad when he did alpha ѕhit, but also comforting him when he felt "depressed" and didn't do anything. To me it's evidence that it's about looks no matter what you do. Anecdotal, of course, but real.
The woman in the show you could tell really wanted Chad inside her. Till he did some really dumb ѕhit that I don't want to get into.

And yes, maybe women can love chads, maybe even love complete beta's, but I don't think they can love just regular joes who are neither chad nor beta.
 
Top