Incel Definitions

lordoftheincels

Well-Known Member
Staff Member
80/20 rule

Top 10%(5?) Super(Giga?) Chad: Get Pοrn sex on first date, can fuck up to two girls a day, steals Norman's girlfriend just by looking at her.

Next 10%(15?) Chad: Gets laid frequently, mostly with average or below average women, has to put forth effort to get women as good looking as himself.

Mid 50% Norman: Has to wine and dine women, put forth lots of effort to court women to get a relationship. Must betaprovide to get laid. Can occasionally find sexual opportunities around drunk women, or women freshly dumped by Chad.

Next 15%, Incel or Failed Norman: Enough social skills to be occasionally invited to parties, such as once a year or every 2 years. Occasionally got laid once or twice with a drunk fatty. Not good looking enough for a woman to date them, remains incel until a woman needs betabux.

Bottom 15%, Trucel: Lifelong virgins or escortcel, must pay for prostitutes to receive female sexual attention.
 

tremor

Well-Known Member
Staff Member
Lounge user
What you called "Super Chad" is more commonly referred to as Giga Chad.
Also I'd say 5% Giga Chad and 15% Chad. Stats needed to make sure though.
 

tremor

Well-Known Member
Staff Member
Lounge user
Also you are assuming no chadflation.

There's some material which may indicate that even 80/20 is cope and it's more like 95/5. Not sure it's enough to actually make conclusions though.
https://psmag.com/environment/17-to-1-reproductive-success
 

lordoftheincels

Well-Known Member
Staff Member
tremor said:
Also you are assuming no chadflation.

There's some material which may indicate that even 80/20 is cope and it's more like 95/5. Not sure it's enough to actually make conclusions though.
https://psmag.com/environment/17-to-1-reproductive-success
I've seen that site several times already. Bit of a skeptic of it honestly. Site gives me too much hipster vibes. I'm not confident in the science listed in that article. The ratio seems ridiculous like, why would the peasants accept that level of slavery?
 

tremor

Well-Known Member
Staff Member
Lounge user
lordoftheincels said:
The ratio seems ridiculous like, why would the peasants accept that level of slavery?
We call it "Chad takes everything". It would sound insane 20 years ago, it looks like a funny joke now, but it may become a lot less amusing in the future.

Well, the only way to really check it is to wait and see. Not that we have many other options.
 

lordoftheincels

Well-Known Member
Staff Member
tremor said:
lordoftheincels said:
The ratio seems ridiculous like, why would the peasants accept that level of slavery?
We call it "Chad takes everything". It would sound insane 20 years ago, it looks like a funny joke now, but it may become a lot less amusing in the future.

Well, the only way to really check it is to wait and see. Not that we have many other options.
8000 years ago there was no such thing as advanced armor. Nothing to protect chad from a peasant uprising.
 

tremor

Well-Known Member
Staff Member
Lounge user
lordoftheincels said:
8000 years ago there was no such thing as advanced armor. Nothing to protect chad from a peasant uprising.
No protection needed from beta cucks. They worship Chad and readily provide for his leftovers once these are thrown away after having hit the wall.
 

lordoftheincels

Well-Known Member
Staff Member
tremor said:
lordoftheincels said:
8000 years ago there was no such thing as advanced armor. Nothing to protect chad from a peasant uprising.
No protection needed from beta cucks. They worship Chad and readily provide for his leftovers once these are thrown away after having hit the wall.
Beta cucks are a product of modernity.

You really believe 8000 years ago, 95% of males would have been cool with being incel?
 

tremor

Well-Known Member
Staff Member
Lounge user
lordoftheincels said:
Beta cucks are a product of modernity.
Cope. Modernity only provided them with social acceptance.
You really believe 8000 years ago, 95% of males would have been cool with being incel?
Where exactly the author of the article states that men felt good about their inceldom?
 

lordoftheincels

Well-Known Member
Staff Member
tremor said:
lordoftheincels said:
Beta cucks are a product of modernity.
Cope. Modernity only provided them with social acceptance.
You really believe 8000 years ago, 95% of males would have been cool with being incel?
Where exactly the author of the article states that men felt good about their inceldom?
Well its just the laws of physics. Men weren't cucked by cops and modern morality of pacifism. There was no advanced armor/training protecting elites like in the 1400s. Chad's were almost as vunerable as the peasants. Doesn't make sense that 95% of men would not mutiny the chads.
 

tremor

Well-Known Member
Staff Member
Lounge user
lordoftheincels said:
Well its just the laws of physics. Men weren't cucked by cops and modern morality of pacifism. There was no advanced armor/training protecting elites like in the 1400s. Chad's were almost as vunerable as the peasants. Doesn't make sense that 95% of men would not mutiny the chads.
What physics?

In 1400 A.D. there were white knights in shining armor, in 1400 B.C. Assyrians, using iron arms, mogged all their neigbours with bronze weapοns.

Anyway Chad can always beat an incel. Even if Chad is unarmed and the incel has a rifle, it takes at the very least to load the weapon, hold it, aim and pull the trigger. You know it's not that simple without training if you have tried. Well, at least it was sort of a challenge to me (to cucks: I never aimed at people).
 

lordoftheincels

Well-Known Member
Staff Member
tremor said:
lordoftheincels said:
Well its just the laws of physics. Men weren't cucked by cops and modern morality of pacifism. There was no advanced armor/training protecting elites like in the 1400s. Chad's were almost as vunerable as the peasants. Doesn't make sense that 95% of men would not mutiny the chads.
What physics?

In 1400 A.D. there were white knights in shining armor, in 1400 B.C. Assyrians, using iron arms, mogged all their neigbours with bronze weapοns.

Anyway Chad can always beat an incel. Even if Chad is unarmed and the incel has a rifle, it takes at the very least to load the weapon, hold it, aim and pull the trigger. You know it's not that simple without training if you have tried. Well, at least it was sort of a challenge to me (to cucks: I never aimed at people).
The physics of metal. You can't just pick and choose these years. The article said 8000 years ago it was the 17:1 ratio. 1400 BC is not 8000 years ago.

Chad always beats incels in movies and films. In real life its 50/50. In the lion kingdom, Chad always ends up getting overthrown by some incel lion.
 

tremor

Well-Known Member
Staff Member
Lounge user
lordoftheincels said:
You can't just pick and choose these years. The article said 8000 years ago it was the 17:1 ratio. 1400 BC is not 8000 years ago.
It was you who first said about 1400. I talked on both 1400 A.D. and 1400 B.C. because you hadn't specified. And uf course all these "x thousand years ago" claims are approximations and estimations.
Chad always beats incels in movies and films. In real life its 50/50. In the lion kingdom, Chad always ends up getting overthrown by some incel lion.
"In the lion kingdom" almost all lions are Chads who are chased away from their pride at certain age to lurk the area for prides of older, weakened Chads. Younger Chads beat the older ones and take over their pride. Also older Chads may be sent their own way once they are unable of fathering cubs. It's hardly applicable to humans.
 

lordoftheincels

Well-Known Member
Staff Member
tremor said:
lordoftheincels said:
You can't just pick and choose these years. The article said 8000 years ago it was the 17:1 ratio. 1400 BC is not 8000 years ago.
It was you who first said about 1400. I talked on both 1400 A.D. and 1400 B.C. because you hadn't specified. And uf course all these "x thousand years ago" claims are approximations and estimations.
Chad always beats incels in movies and films. In real life its 50/50. In the lion kingdom, Chad always ends up getting overthrown by some incel lion.
"In the lion kingdom" almost all lions are Chads who are chased away from their pride at certain age to lurk the area for prides of older, weakened Chads. Younger Chads beat the older ones and take over their pride. Also older Chads may be sent their own way once they are unable of fathering cubs. It's hardly applicable to humans.
I said in the 1400s there was armor, and then you proved me right.
 
Top