Imagine how useless women would be to this world if they had no vaginas

WelcomeToMyDNA

I am who I am and I can be no other
They are physically weak. The majority of them are dumb and low iq. They have shit survival skills. They can't do construction, hard labor, etc. They would be useless as fuck. Jfl at the thought of pussy-less foids.
 

lordoftheincels

Incels.Net Master
Mostly due to sheltering in urban environments.

Males may get fat and unfit but they never fully leave the wilds, due to incel preventing them from ever experiencing truly prolonged mental comfort. Due to incel they never truly fall in love with the city, and a part of them forever despises it.

A "man" can watch videos of how to succeed at an interview, but a part of him will always hate the fact he is trapped within social constructs, submitting to someone under artificial pretenses.
 

Xero1101

Incels.Net Novice
Women’s #1 asset is their pussies. Honestly through in some alernate universe if women didn’t have pussies they’d still wield power, men would still want to cuddle and roll around with them naked under the sheets, they’d still have boobs, ass, sexy legs etc
 

lordoftheincels

Incels.Net Master
Xero1101 said:
Women’s #1 asset is their pussies. Honestly through in some alernate universe if women didn’t have pussies they’d still wield power, men would still want to cuddle and roll around with them naked under the sheets, they’d still have boobs, ass, sexy legs etc
Actually the 1# asset is the nurturing-ness, there is a subconscious association that a woman will be comforting to be near.

Prolonged exposure to feminism may result in asexuality, since it shatters the subconscious perception of a woman being nurturing.
 

Desperate1

Incels.Net Junior
They would still be physically attractive and thus still worth more than all of us. We are ugly, no one wants our penis, and I wont inspire shit in an artist. So they'll still be worth more than us.
 

lordoftheincels

Incels.Net Master
Desperate1 said:
They would still be phically attractive and thus still worth more that all of us. We are ugly, noone wants my penis, and I wont inspire ѕhit in an artist. So they'll still be worth more than us.
They are physically attractive because of the subconscious association of being nurturing.

Fags, replaced the subconscious association with men.

The physical form of synergy, between their softness and curves causes a connection to the real, physical, with the subconscious perspective. Only soft fags have this synergy. Hard fags don't, because hard muscles are meant for soft things, and so forth. The exception is lesbians, since soft can merge into soft, soft can merge into soft or hard, but hard cannot ever truly merge into hard.
 

Desperate1

Incels.Net Junior
Yeah I don't know what your babbling about. But when I see a hot girl or a perfect rack I don't think about her innate "nurturing" abilities. Women are still physically beautiful, we are not. Period.
 

lordoftheincels

Incels.Net Master
Desperate1 said:
Yeah I don't know what your babbling about. But when I see a hot girl or a perfect rack I don't think about her innate "nurturing" abilities. Women are still physically beautiful, we are not. Period.
You aren't aware of how your own mind works obviously.
 

lordoftheincels

Incels.Net Master
Desperate1 said:
Women are still physically beautiful, we are not. Period.
The curves cause a synergy, a mirror between subconscious and physical reality
"The physical form of synergy, between their softness and curves causes a connection to the real, physical, with the subconscious perspective. Only soft fags have this synergy. Hard fags don't, because hard muscles are meant for soft things, and so forth. The exception is lesbians, since soft can merge into soft, soft can merge into soft or hard, but hard cannot ever truly merge into hard."
 

Desperate1

Incels.Net Junior
Yeah sure thing buddy. Your psuedosciebtific bullshit in no way negates the fact that even if women had no pussy, they are still better to look at than you. Ie they would still have more societal worth. It's fucking bullshit, bit it's true.
 

lordoftheincels

Incels.Net Master
Desperate1 said:
Yeah sure thing buddy. Your psuedosciebtific bullshit in no way negates the fact that even if women had no pusѕy, they are still better to look at than you. Ie they would still have more societal worth. It's fuсking bullshit, bit it's true.
Logic trumps emotion. Because you don't understand it, doesn't mean you have to use curse words and call it bullshit. Have some class, instead of resorting to guttural emotions.
 

Desperate1

Incels.Net Junior
You're absolutely right. I apologize, I really do. For the record, I understand the point you want to make. I simply don't agree. Didn't mean to be a dick to you though, sorry.
 

lordoftheincels

Incels.Net Master
Desperate1 said:
You're absolutely right. I apologize, I really do. For the record, I understand the point you want to make. I simply don't agree. Didn't mean to be a dick to you though, sorry.
Physical attraction only exists if you are horny. When you are not horny your subconscious is not doing what I said it was doing in the first place.

When not horny a pic of Ben Franklin has equal beauty to a pic of anime chick. When horny pic of anime chick goes up in value (if not gay)

Some guy got married to his car one time. It had curves. He swapped the subconscious nurturing mechanism with a car.

A kid who is treated like trash by women will either a. become a submissive soyboy and long for a dominatrix (subconscious still intact) or b. turn into a fаg (swapping out subconscious and replacing it with men.)

If b. and is fаg, the only way it will work is if he becomes a submissive soyboy fаg because soft goes into soft, soft goes into hard but hard cannot go into hard. Ie. women are soft and thus attracted to muscular men, women are not attracted to wimpy penises, the nurturing is the strength of a hard man going into soft. Hard unto hard is not nurturing.
 

Desperate1

Incels.Net Junior
If women only desire hard men, couldn't we all work out, become gross fucking body builders, and get all the pussy we wanted? If it's that easy to get women, why the fuck are we here?
 

lordoftheincels

Incels.Net Master
Desperate1 said:
If women only desire hard men, couldn't we all work out, become gross fuсking body builders, and get all the pusѕy we wanted? If it's that easy to get women, why the fuck are we here?
Women are mostly bi and go for women or chad. And hard is not the same as ugly. Women desire hard muscles but not ugly features.
 

WelcomeToMyDNA

I am who I am and I can be no other
I think women would be mostly useless without pussies, but I would still want one because

A) their voices are so light, sweet, and beautiful
B) I would want someone as a companion
C) I would stick my cock in their mouth or ass or some other hole in their body

idk...it's like I just wish women weren't just superficial beings without empathy and compassion.
 

Ebarraced1

Incels.Net Junior
If you think that Ben Franklin is just as hot as whatever porn you watch... You're probably gay bud. Nothing wrong with that. But it probably clarifies your woman hated.
 

Ebarraced1

Incels.Net Junior
Are women any more unless than an incel that bitches into Thier computers instead of bettering themselves in order to get women. Even if we totally striped women of Thier rights, a fucking Drogo would still get all the women and we would still be a batch of betas.
 

lordoftheincels

Incels.Net Master
Ebarraced1 said:
If you think that Ben Franklin is just as hot as whatever pοrn you watch... You're probably gay bud. Nothing wrong with that. But it probably clarifies your woman hated.
Vcel, how do we ban mentally retarded faggots who have learning disability permanently?
 
Top